Kakamega Senator Boni Khalwale has raised concerns over the frequent reshuffling of parliamentary committees, cautioning that such moves undermine Parliament's ability to effectively oversee government functions.
Speaking during a Senate debate on recent committee changes, Khalwale argued that while political parties may adjust internal leadership roles like whips, committee memberships should remain stable to preserve institutional memory and ensure continuity in legislative oversight.
"It is acceptable for parties to appoint or remove whips as part of their internal decisions. However, committee assignments are critical for parliamentary work and should not be used as political rewards or punishments," Khalwale stated.
His remarks followed recent reassignments on the minority side, including Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna's move from the County Public Accounts Committee to the Agriculture Committee and his replacement as Deputy Senate Minority Whip. Similarly, Vihiga Senator Godfrey Osotsi was replaced as chairperson of the Senate County Public Investments and Special Funds Committee.
Khalwale emphasized that denying legislators opportunities to serve on committees based on their political views only elevates political tensions rather than fostering effective oversight. He cited historical examples of leaders who overcame political setbacks to illustrate the importance of allowing Parliament to function independently.
During the debate, nominated Senator Karen Nyamu raised a point of order, urging Khalwale to avoid personal remarks and focus on the issue at hand. The Speaker reminded members to maintain decorum and concentrate on committee changes without casting aspersions on colleagues.
Complying with the guidance, Khalwale reiterated that committee assignments should be based on competence and continuity, arguing that frequent reshuffles disrupt Parliament’s constitutional mandate and weaken its role as a pillar of democracy.
The recent changes have sparked mixed reactions within Parliament, with some defending them as internal political arrangements, while others highlight the negative impact on parliamentary oversight effectiveness.
